Paul Glass: The stability of 10 rule violations and violations of profits and stability rules is the largest in the Premier League, and the administrative authorities have been expelled greatly in relation to their faces.
Some say the competition has decided to reject Everton’s complaints. There are praise there, but I try to harm people who violate the financial rules. If Everton justifies 10 points to violate the rules, if many people are guilty, if there are no 115 violations, the city’s business will embody a strong and powerful abandonment and almost all queue.
After all, there is a reason these allegations have been going on for almost five years.Would City be a threat if Everton became the benchmark for such punishment? Do you think that is reasonable enough? Given that the Premier League may return with some specific issues for the first time, the lack of a real ‘right answer’ here is a big problem. EFL is under no obligation to include the city in the pyramid.Is it too hot to suggest a descent into the lower echelons of English professional football? Such a punishment would be unprecedented, innovative and truly shocking. The same goes for taxes levied by the city. This is a difficult balancing act for the Premier League, but one that cannot be fairly resolved with double-digit points deductions or financial penalties.
The 30 points are the biggest haul in English football for Luton Town in 2008, but a draw simply means missing out on a season of Champions League football at the Etihad.We are entering uncharted territory in the English game, and if Everton’s suspension proves the Premier League is willing to step up, what they did to City – if found guilty – shows their mettle against an English team. the fight
